DeepSeek R1 0528 demonstrates superior performance in logical reasoning and mathematical problem-solving, achieving higher scores across MMLU and GSM8K benchmarks while maintaining exceptional cost efficiency with significantly lower token pricing. In contrast, Grok 4 excels in creative generation tasks, multimodal capabilities, and real-time data processing, offering faster response times and native image understanding. The choice between these models ultimately depends on your specific use case: opt for DeepSeek when prioritizing analytical accuracy and budget constraints, or choose Grok 4 for applications requiring creative output, visual processing, and low-latency interactions. DeepSeek R1 0528 demonstrates superior performance in logical reasoning and mathematical problem-solving, achieving higher scores across MMLU and GSM8K benchmarks while maintaining exceptional cost efficiency with significantly lower token pricing. In contrast, Grok 4 excels in creative generation tasks, multimodal capabilities, and real-time data processing, offering faster response times and native image understanding. The choice between these models ultimately depends on your specific use case: opt for DeepSeek when prioritizing analytical accuracy and budget constraints, or choose Grok 4 for applications requiring creative output, visual processing, and low-latency interactions.
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Grok 4 Fast
Standard Benchmarks
Intelligence Score
Choose DeepSeek R1 for applications requiring deep analytical reasoning, complex mathematical computations, and extensive code generation. Its superior cost efficiency makes it ideal for high-volume deployments where budget optimization is critical without compromising on logical accuracy. Choose DeepSeek R1 for applications requiring deep analytical reasoning, complex mathematical computations, and extensive code generation. Its superior cost efficiency makes it ideal for high-volume deployments where budget optimization is critical without compromising on logical accuracy.
Opt for Grok 4 when your workflow demands creative content generation, multimodal understanding with image processing, and real-time responsiveness. Its lower latency and native visual capabilities make it perfect for interactive applications and tasks requiring diverse creative outputs. Opt for Grok 4 when your workflow demands creative content generation, multimodal understanding with image processing, and real-time responsiveness. Its lower latency and native visual capabilities make it perfect for interactive applications and tasks requiring diverse creative outputs.
Speed & Latency
Real-world performance metrics measuring response time, throughput, and stability under load.
Cost Efficiency
Pricing per million tokens for input and output, affecting total cost of ownership for different use cases.
Integration & API Ecosystem
Developer tooling, SDK availability, and integration capabilities for production deployments.
Related Comparisons
GPT-4o vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Claude 3.5 Haiku
Nova Premier 1.0 vs Grok 4 Fast
FAQs
DeepSeek R1 0528 demonstrates superior accuracy on reasoning benchmarks like MMLU and GSM8K, making it the better choice for tasks requiring precision and logical thinking.
DeepSeek R1 0528 is significantly more cost-effective, with pricing approximately 60% lower than Grok 4for both input and output tokens.
Grok 4 offers lower latency and higher token throughput, making it better suited for real-time applications and user-facing chatbots.
No. Grok 4 supports both text and image inputs, while DeepSeek R1 0528 is currently text-only.
Yes! Both models are available in the AnyAPI Playground where you can run side-by-side comparisons with your own prompts.
Try it for free in AnyChat
Experience these powerful AI models in real-time.
Compare outputs, test performance, and find the perfect model for your needs.