GPT-4o vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Standard Benchmarks
Intelligence Score
Speed & Latency
Real-world performance metrics measuring response time, throughput, and stability under load.
Cost Efficiency
Pricing per million tokens for input and output, affecting total cost of ownership for different use cases.
Integration & API Ecosystem
Developer tooling, SDK availability, and integration capabilities for production deployments.
Related Comparisons
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Claude 3.5 Haiku
Nova Premier 1.0 vs Grok 4 Fast
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Grok 4 Fast
FAQs
Both models excel in different areas. GPT-4o leads in multimodal tasks and creative applications, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet demonstrates superior accuracy in reasoning, mathematics, and analytical tasks. Overall accuracy depends on your specific use case.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet typically offers better cost efficiency for text-only applications, while GPT-4o's pricing reflects its multimodal capabilities. Exact costs vary by usage volume and specific API endpoints, with both offering competitive enterprise pricing.
GPT-4o generally provides faster response times, especially for shorter queries and multimodal tasks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet may take longer for complex reasoning but offers more thorough analysis. Speed varies based on query complexity and current API load.
GPT-4o supports text, image, and audio inputs with strong multimodal capabilities. Claude 3.5 Sonnet primarily focuses on text and image inputs, with particularly strong performance in document analysis and visual reasoning tasks.
Yes! Both models are available in the AnyApi Playground where you can run side-by-side comparisons with your own prompts.
Try it for free in AnyChat
Experience these powerful AI models in real-time.
Compare outputs, test performance, and find the perfect model for your needs.