DeepSeek V3.1 vs Claude 3.5 Haiku
Compare
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1
and
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku (2024-10-22)
on reasoning, speed, cost, and features.
Models
COntext size
Cutoff date
I/O cost
Max output
Latency
Speed
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku (2024-10-22)
Standard Benchmarks
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku (2024-10-22)
MMLU
GSM8K
HumanEval
TruthfulQA
Intelligence Score
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku (2024-10-22)
Speed & Latency
Real-world performance metrics measuring response time, throughput, and stability under load.
metric
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku (2024-10-22)
Average latency
ms
ms
Tokens/Second
Response Stability
Verdict:
Cost Efficiency
Pricing per million tokens for input and output, affecting total cost of ownership for different use cases.
Pricing
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku (2024-10-22)
Input tokens
Output tokens
Verdict:
Integration & API Ecosystem
Developer tooling, SDK availability, and integration capabilities for production deployments.
Feature
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1
Anthropic: Claude 3.5 Haiku (2024-10-22)
REST API
Official SDKs
Function Calling
Streaming Support
Multimodal Input
Open Weights
Verdict:
Related Comparisons
GPT-4o vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet
GPT-4o leads in multimodal tasks; Claude 3.5 Sonnet excels in reasoning
Nova Premier 1.0 vs Grok 4 Fast
Grok excels in real-time data; Nova Premier mini is cost-effective.
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Grok 4 Fast
DeepSeek dominates logic; Grok shines in creativity.
FAQs
Which model is more accurate overall?
How do the costs compare?
Which model is faster?
Do both models support multimodal inputs?
Can I test both models in AnyAPI Playground?
Try it for free in AnyChat
Experience these powerful AI models in real-time.
Compare outputs, test performance, and find the perfect model for your needs.