The AI Terms Every Developer Should Know in 2025

If you’ve worked around AI even briefly, you’ve likely encountered a flood of acronyms and jargon: LLMs, embeddings, fine-tuning, RAG, inference endpoints, orchestration layers, and more. The problem isn’t that developers can’t keep up — it’s that the ecosystem itself is evolving faster than the vocabulary that describes it.

In this post, we’ll break down the core AI and infrastructure terms every modern developer should know, especially those building with multiple providers or integrating AI via APIs. This isn’t just a glossary — it’s a practical map of the concepts shaping the next generation of intelligent applications.

‍

The Foundation: LLMs, Tokens, and Embeddings

‍

At the center of AI development today are Large Language Models (LLMs) — generative neural networks trained on massive text corpora. Models like GPT-4, Claude 3.5, Llama 3, and Mistral power everything from chatbots to coding copilots.

Understanding how these models interact with your codebase starts with three essential concepts:

1. Tokens — The smallest unit of text AI models process. One token roughly equals four English characters or 0.75 words. APIs typically bill by token usage — both input (prompt) and output (response).

2. Embeddings — Numeric representations of text used to measure semantic similarity. They’re crucial for search, retrieval, and context injection in applications like RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation).

3. Context window — The total number of tokens a model can process in one interaction. Modern models like Claude 3 Opus (200k tokens) or GPT-4 Turbo (128k tokens) enable long-context reasoning, powering features like document analysis and multi-turn conversations.

Insert chart comparing context window sizes and latency among top LLMs here.

Understanding these terms isn’t just academic — it directly impacts cost, latency, and product design. A model’s context window, for example, determines how much data you can process per request before needing architectural workarounds like chunking or vector retrieval.

‍

The Middle Layer: Inference, Orchestration, and RAG

‍

Building AI applications isn’t just about picking a model — it’s about how that model interacts with data and infrastructure. That’s where the middleware layer comes in.

Inference

Inference is the act of running a model to get predictions. Think of it as the “runtime” phase of AI: the model has already been trained, and now you’re querying it for results. Efficient inference pipelines depend on low-latency endpoints and GPU orchestration — whether hosted through APIs like OpenAI, Anthropic, or via your own deployment stack.

Orchestration

As teams use multiple models for different tasks (e.g., classification, reasoning, summarization), orchestration frameworks manage this complexity. They handle prompt routing, retry logic, caching, and fallbacks across LLM providers.

Here’s a conceptual example using pseudocode to illustrate multi-model orchestration:

def query_ai(prompt):
    try:
        return call_model("anthropic/claude-3", prompt)
    except TimeoutError:
        return call_model("openai/gpt-4", prompt)

This pattern—sometimes abstracted behind services like LangChain, LlamaIndex, or AnyAPI orchestration layer—is foundational for multi-provider AI environments.

‍

RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)

RAG is a popular architecture that combines retrieval systems (like vector databases) with generative models. Instead of relying on the LLM’s internal training data, it retrieves relevant context from your dataset before generating a response.

That’s why RAG has become the default solution for enterprise AI — it provides factual grounding and domain accuracy without retraining a model.

‍

The Advanced Layer: Fine-Tuning, Agents, and Function Calling

‍

Once you’ve mastered inference and orchestration, you enter the customization layer — where teams shape model behavior and connect it to business logic.

‍

Fine-tuning

Fine-tuning means retraining a model on your specific data to specialize it. It’s expensive but effective when you have proprietary text, tone, or structured tasks. However, for most SaaS and devtool startups, fine-tuning is being replaced by prompt engineering and context injection, which are cheaper and faster to iterate on.

‍

Function calling / Tool use

A defining feature of modern LLMs, function calling allows models to execute predefined operations. For example, instead of returning “The weather in Madrid is 24°C,” a model can call an API to fetch live data.

‍

{
 "function": "get_weather",
 "arguments": {"city": "Madrid"}
}

‍

This bridges AI reasoning with your operational logic — enabling AI agents that can browse, fetch, or execute tasks safely through structured APIs.

Agents

Agents take this one step further. They are stateful systems that use reasoning loops and tool calls to achieve objectives. In 2025, most production-grade agents aren’t autonomous “AI employees,” but rather semi-automated workflows. For example:

• An agent that monitors errors across your infrastructure.
• A support assistant that classifies tickets and drafts replies.
• A coding assistant that edits your repo via GitHub API.

The complexity lies in orchestrating agents and preventing infinite loops — an emerging focus area for infrastructure providers.

‍

The Infrastructure Layer: APIs, Interoperability, and Multi-Model Systems

Behind every LLM-based app is a web of APIs, storage systems, and orchestration layers. Developers rarely interact with one model directly — they interact with an ecosystem.

LLM infrastructure refers to the combined stack of model endpoints, context management, memory, and billing layers that make multi-provider AI possible.

Key challenges in this layer include:

• Interoperability: standardizing request formats across providers.
• Cost management: balancing inference costs versus response quality.
• Latency optimization: caching embeddings and responses intelligently.
• Monitoring: tracking token usage, errors, and response drift.

This is where API flexibility becomes a differentiator. Teams increasingly prefer unified API layers — platforms that abstract model differences and handle rate limits, retries, and analytics across providers.

‍

The Human Layer: Prompt Engineering and Evaluation

AI systems are only as good as their inputs. Prompt engineering has evolved from an art into a measurable engineering discipline. Teams now use prompt templates, evaluation frameworks, and A/B tests to systematically improve outputs.

Common metrics include:

• Relevance (Does the response match intent?)
• Factual accuracy
• Conciseness
• Latency vs. quality trade-off

Open-source tools like Promptfoo, Evals, and TruLens help teams analyze responses at scale. But in practice, the best results come from integrating evaluation loops directly into production — treating prompts as living components of your stack, not static strings in your code.

‍

From Understanding to Building

AI terminology changes fast, but the underlying goal stays the same — creating interoperable, reliable, and cost-efficient systems that connect intelligence with infrastructure.

As AI moves from experimentation to orchestration, developers who understand these foundational concepts — from tokens to agents to orchestration layers — will be the ones shaping how intelligent software gets built.

At AnyAPI, we’re building that connective tissue — a unified platform to access, compare, and orchestrate LLMs from multiple providers through a single, flexible interface. Whether you’re running one model or fifty, understanding these terms isn’t just about vocabulary. It’s about building the future of intelligent infrastructure — one API call at a time.

‍