Kimi K2 vs DeepSeek V3

Compare
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2
and
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3
on reasoning, speed, cost, and features.
Models
COntext size
Cutoff date
I/O cost *
Max output
Latency
Speed
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2
128000
2024-10
₳3/₳14.4
4096
200ms
120
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3
128000
2024-10
₳1.8/₳7.2
8192
300ms
100
*₳ = ₳nyTokens

Standard Benchmarks

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3
90.17
88.5
92.2
89.3
85.7
65.2
MMLU
GSM8K
HumanEval
DeepSeek V3 emerges as the clear performance leader in this comparison, delivering superior capabilities across most benchmarks while maintaining competitive pricing. With its massive 671B parameter architecture, DeepSeek V3 excels in complex reasoning tasks and demonstrates stronger multilingual capabilities. The model offers impressive cost efficiency, typically priced lower than comparable flagship models while delivering enterprise-grade performance. DeepSeek V3 also provides faster inference speeds and supports larger context windows, making it ideal for processing extensive documents or maintaining long conversations. Kimi K2, while smaller in scale, brings unique strengths particularly in Chinese language processing and cultural understanding. MoonshotAI has optimized Kimi K2 for specific regional applications, offering nuanced comprehension of Chinese contexts that may surpass larger international models. The model provides reliable performance for standard tasks while maintaining competitive response times. However, DeepSeek V3's broader training and more recent architecture give it advantages in mathematical reasoning, code generation, and complex analytical tasks. For developers choosing between these models, the decision often comes down to specific regional requirements versus raw performance capabilities. DeepSeek V3 represents better value for most international applications, while Kimi K2 serves specialized Chinese market needs effectively.
Compare in AnyChat Now

Intelligence Score

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3
87
85

When to choose MoonshotAI: Kimi K2

Choose Kimi K2 for Chinese-language applications requiring deep cultural understanding, regional content creation, or localized customer service. Its specialized training makes it ideal for Chinese market research, translation nuances, and culturally-sensitive communications where regional expertise matters more than raw computational power.

When to choose DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3

Select DeepSeek V3 for complex reasoning tasks, advanced code generation, mathematical problem-solving, and international applications. Its superior benchmark performance makes it perfect for research, data analysis, multilingual content creation, and enterprise applications requiring consistent high-quality outputs across diverse domains.

Speed & Latency

Real-world performance metrics measuring response time, throughput, and stability under load.

metric
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3
Average latency
300ms
ms
200ms
ms
Tokens/Second
120
100
Response Stability
Excellent
Excellent
Verdict:
DeepSeek V3 provides faster response times consistently

Cost Efficiency

Price per token for input and output, affecting total cost of ownership for different use cases.

Pricing
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3
Input ₳nyTokens
₳3
₳14.4
Output ₳nyTokens
₳1.8
₳7.2
Verdict:
DeepSeek V3 delivers superior value with lower costs

Integration & API Ecosystem

Developer tooling, SDK availability, and integration capabilities for production deployments.

Feature
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3
REST API
Official SDKs
Function Calling
Streaming Support
Multimodal Input
Open Weights
Verdict:
DeepSeek V3 delivers superior value with lower costs

Related Comparisons

GLM 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 405B

GLM 4.6 offers efficiency; Llama 3.1 405B delivers enterprise-grade performance

Cohere Command R+ vs GPT-4 Turbo

Command R+ offers cost efficiency; GPT-4 Turbo delivers superior performance

GPT-4o vs Llama 3.3 70B

GPT-4o leads in multimodal capabilities; Llama 3.3 offers open-source flexibility

Frequently
Asked
Questions

DeepSeek V3 demonstrates higher accuracy across most standardized benchmarks, particularly excelling in reasoning, mathematics, and code generation tasks, while Kimi K2 shows specialized accuracy in Chinese language and cultural contexts.

DeepSeek V3 typically offers better cost efficiency despite its larger scale, with competitive pricing that delivers more capability per dollar spent compared to Kimi K2's specialized but more limited scope.

DeepSeek V3 generally provides faster response times and better throughput, benefiting from optimized inference architecture, while Kimi K2 offers respectable but comparatively slower performance for most tasks.

DeepSeek V3 supports multimodal capabilities including text and code processing, while Kimi K2 primarily focuses on text-based interactions with some multimodal features depending on the specific implementation version.

Yes! Both models are available in the AnyApi Playground where you can run side-by-side comparisons with your own prompts.

Try it for free in AnyChat

Experience these powerful AI models in real-time. Compare outputs, test performance, and find the perfect model for your needs.