Grok Code Fast 1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

Compare
xAI: Grok Code Fast 1
and
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
on reasoning, speed, cost, and features.
Models
COntext size
Cutoff date
I/O cost *
Max output
Latency
Speed
xAI: Grok Code Fast 1
256000
2024-07
₳1.2/₳9
40000
365
180
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
200000
2025-07
₳18/₳90
64000
1800
63
*₳ = ₳nyTokens

Standard Benchmarks

xAI: Grok Code Fast 1
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
73.2
88.3
96.4
85
93
MMLU
GSM8K
HumanEval
xAI's Grok Code Fast 1 and Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 4.5 represent different philosophies in AI model design. Grok Code Fast 1 emphasizes rapid response times, making it ideal for applications where speed is critical. Its streamlined architecture delivers quick outputs, though sometimes at the expense of nuanced reasoning. Claude Sonnet 4.5, meanwhile, focuses on sophisticated analysis and reasoning capabilities. It excels in complex problem-solving scenarios, offering more thoughtful and comprehensive responses. In terms of cost, Claude Sonnet 4.5 typically commands higher pricing due to its advanced capabilities, while Grok Code Fast 1 offers more budget-friendly options for speed-focused applications. Context window sizes vary, with Claude Sonnet 4.5 generally supporting longer conversations and document analysis. Both models handle coding tasks effectively, but their approaches differ - Grok prioritizes quick code generation and debugging, while Claude provides more detailed explanations and considers edge cases. For developers choosing between them, the decision often comes down to whether your application prioritizes speed or depth of analysis.
Compare in AnyChat Now

Intelligence Score

xAI: Grok Code Fast 1
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
93

When to choose xAI: Grok Code Fast 1

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 for real-time applications requiring immediate responses, rapid prototyping sessions, quick code debugging, live chat implementations, and scenarios where low latency is more important than comprehensive analysis.

When to choose Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5

Select Claude Sonnet 4.5 for complex reasoning tasks, detailed code reviews, comprehensive documentation generation, strategic planning, research analysis, and applications requiring nuanced understanding and thorough explanations.

Speed & Latency

Real-world performance metrics measuring response time, throughput, and stability under load.

metric
xAI: Grok Code Fast 1
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
Average latency
365
ms
1800
ms
Tokens/Second
180
63
Response Stability
Very Good
Excellent
Verdict:
Grok Code Fast 1 delivers faster response times

Cost Efficiency

Price per token for input and output, affecting total cost of ownership for different use cases.

Pricing
xAI: Grok Code Fast 1
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
Input ₳nyTokens
₳1.2
₳18
Output ₳nyTokens
₳9
₳90
Verdict:
Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers better value for complex tasks

Integration & API Ecosystem

Developer tooling, SDK availability, and integration capabilities for production deployments.

Feature
xAI: Grok Code Fast 1
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
REST API
Official SDKs
Function Calling
Streaming Support
Multimodal Input
Open Weights
Verdict:
Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers better value for complex tasks

Related Comparisons

GPT-4o vs Llama 3.3 70B

GPT-4o leads in multimodal capabilities; Llama 3.3 offers open-source flexibility

Gemini 1.5 Flash vs GPT-3.5 Turbo

Gemini 1.5 Flash offers multimodal capabilities; GPT-3.5 Turbo provides reliable text processing

Grok 4 vs Grok 3

Grok 4 delivers superior performance; Grok 3 offers proven reliability

FAQs

Which model is more accurate overall?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 generally provides more accurate results for complex reasoning tasks, while Grok Code Fast 1 maintains good accuracy for straightforward queries with faster delivery.

How do the costs compare?

Grok Code Fast 1 typically offers more cost-effective pricing for high-volume applications, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs more but provides better value for complex analytical tasks.

Which model is faster?

Grok Code Fast 1 is optimized for speed and delivers significantly faster response times, making it ideal for real-time applications where latency matters most.

Do both models support multimodal inputs?

Both models support text inputs, but their multimodal capabilities may vary. Check the specific model documentation for current image, audio, and document processing features.

Can I test both models in AnyAPI Playground?

Yes! Both models are available in the AnyApi Playground where you can run side-by-side comparisons with your own prompts.

Try it for free in AnyChat

Experience these powerful AI models in real-time.
Compare outputs, test performance, and find the perfect model for your needs.