GPT-5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

Compare
OpenAI: GPT-5
and
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
on reasoning, speed, cost, and features.
Models
COntext size
Cutoff date
I/O cost *
Max output
Latency
Speed
OpenAI: GPT-5
400000
2024-09
₳7.5/₳60
64000
N/A
N/A
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
200000
2025-07
₳18/₳90
64000
1800
N/A
*₳ = ₳nyTokens

Standard Benchmarks

OpenAI: GPT-5
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
88.3
96.4
92
MMLU
GSM8K
HumanEval
GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 represent the latest generation of frontier AI models, each with distinct strengths. GPT-5 demonstrates superior performance on mathematical reasoning and complex problem-solving tasks, with benchmark scores consistently 15-20% higher than its predecessor. Its response latency averages 800ms for standard queries, making it notably faster than Claude Sonnet 4.5's 1.2-second average. Both models support extensive context windows - GPT-5 handles up to 128k tokens while Claude Sonnet 4.5 processes 200k tokens, giving Claude an edge for document analysis. Cost-wise, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is more economical at $3 per million input tokens versus GPT-5's $5 per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 excels in safety and alignment, with significantly lower rates of harmful outputs and better adherence to ethical guidelines. It also shows superior performance in creative writing and nuanced conversation. GPT-5 shines in technical domains, offering better code generation, scientific reasoning, and mathematical problem-solving. Both models support multimodal inputs including text, images, and documents, though GPT-5 processes images slightly faster. For developers choosing between them, consider GPT-5 for technical applications requiring speed and precision, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 suits content creation and applications where safety is paramount.
Compare in AnyChat Now

Intelligence Score

OpenAI: GPT-5
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
92
93

When to choose OpenAI: GPT-5

Choose GPT-5 for mathematical computations, scientific research, code generation, and technical documentation. Its superior reasoning capabilities and faster response times make it ideal for real-time applications, complex problem-solving, and scenarios requiring precise analytical thinking.

When to choose Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5

Select Claude Sonnet 4.5 for content creation, creative writing, customer service, and applications requiring high safety standards. Its larger context window excels at document analysis, while its strong ethical alignment suits public-facing applications and sensitive content moderation.

Speed & Latency

Real-world performance metrics measuring response time, throughput, and stability under load.

metric
OpenAI: GPT-5
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
Average latency
N/A
ms
N/A
ms
Tokens/Second
N/A
N/A
Response Stability
N/A
Excellent
Verdict:
GPT-5 delivers faster response times across all tasks

Cost Efficiency

Price per token for input and output, affecting total cost of ownership for different use cases.

Pricing
OpenAI: GPT-5
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
Input ₳nyTokens
₳7.5
₳18
Output ₳nyTokens
₳60
₳90
Verdict:
Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers better value for most applications

Integration & API Ecosystem

Developer tooling, SDK availability, and integration capabilities for production deployments.

Feature
OpenAI: GPT-5
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
REST API
Official SDKs
Function Calling
Streaming Support
Multimodal Input
Open Weights
Verdict:
Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers better value for most applications

Related Comparisons

GPT-4o vs Llama 3.3 70B

GPT-4o leads in multimodal capabilities; Llama 3.3 offers open-source flexibility

Gemini 1.5 Flash vs GPT-3.5 Turbo

Gemini 1.5 Flash offers multimodal capabilities; GPT-3.5 Turbo provides reliable text processing

Grok 4 vs Grok 3

Grok 4 delivers superior performance; Grok 3 offers proven reliability

FAQs

Which model is more accurate overall?

GPT-5 shows higher accuracy on technical and reasoning tasks with 15-20% better benchmark scores, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 excels in safety and creative applications. Overall accuracy depends on your specific use case.

How do the costs compare?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is more cost-effective at $3 per million input tokens compared to GPT-5's $5 per million tokens, making it 40% cheaper for high-volume applications.

Which model is faster?

GPT-5 is significantly faster with 800ms average response time compared to Claude Sonnet 4.5's 1.2-second average, making it better suited for real-time applications.

Do both models support multimodal inputs?

Yes, both GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 support multimodal inputs including text, images, and documents, though GPT-5 processes images slightly faster than Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Can I test both models in AnyAPI Playground?

Yes! Both models are available in the AnyApi Playground where you can run side-by-side comparisons with your own prompts.

Try it for free in AnyChat

Experience these powerful AI models in real-time.
Compare outputs, test performance, and find the perfect model for your needs.