GPT-5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5
Standard Benchmarks
Intelligence Score
Speed & Latency
Real-world performance metrics measuring response time, throughput, and stability under load.
Cost Efficiency
Price per token for input and output, affecting total cost of ownership for different use cases.
Integration & API Ecosystem
Developer tooling, SDK availability, and integration capabilities for production deployments.
Related Comparisons
GPT-4o vs Llama 3.3 70B
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Grok 4 vs Grok 3
FAQs
GPT-5 shows higher accuracy on technical and reasoning tasks with 15-20% better benchmark scores, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 excels in safety and creative applications. Overall accuracy depends on your specific use case.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is more cost-effective at $3 per million input tokens compared to GPT-5's $5 per million tokens, making it 40% cheaper for high-volume applications.
GPT-5 is significantly faster with 800ms average response time compared to Claude Sonnet 4.5's 1.2-second average, making it better suited for real-time applications.
Yes, both GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 support multimodal inputs including text, images, and documents, though GPT-5 processes images slightly faster than Claude Sonnet 4.5.
Yes! Both models are available in the AnyApi Playground where you can run side-by-side comparisons with your own prompts.
Try it for free in AnyChat
Experience these powerful AI models in real-time.
Compare outputs, test performance, and find the perfect model for your needs.