GPT-4 Turbo vs Claude 3 Opus

Compare
OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo
and
Anthropic: Claude 3 Opus
on reasoning, speed, cost, and features.
Models
COntext size
Cutoff date
I/O cost *
Max output
Latency
Speed
OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo
128000
2024-04
₳60/₳180
4096
2500
35
Anthropic: Claude 3 Opus
200000
2023-08
₳90/₳450
4096
2500
25
*₳ = ₳nyTokens

Standard Benchmarks

OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo
Anthropic: Claude 3 Opus
86.4
86.8
95
92
87.1
84.9
MMLU
GSM8K
HumanEval

GPT-4 Turbo and Claude 3 Opus represent the pinnacle of their respective companies' AI capabilities, each with distinct strengths. GPT-4 Turbo excels in speed and cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for high-volume applications. It offers a 128k context window and strong performance across coding, writing, and analysis tasks at a more accessible price point. The model's optimized architecture delivers faster response times, crucial for real-time applications and user-facing products. Claude 3 Opus, while more expensive, demonstrates superior reasoning capabilities and nuanced understanding of complex prompts. It matches GPT-4 Turbo's 128k context window but often produces more thoughtful, detailed responses. Opus particularly shines in tasks requiring deep analysis, ethical reasoning, and creative writing where quality trumps speed. Both models support multimodal inputs, handling text and images effectively. The choice often comes down to your specific needs - GPT-4 Turbo for efficiency and speed in production environments, or Claude 3 Opus when you need the highest quality reasoning and are willing to pay premium pricing for superior output quality.

Compare in AnyChat Now

Intelligence Score

OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo
Anthropic: Claude 3 Opus
83
91

When to choose OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo

Choose GPT-4 Turbo for production applications requiring fast response times, cost-effective scaling, and reliable performance across diverse tasks. Ideal for chatbots, content generation pipelines, coding assistance, and high-volume API integrations where speed and efficiency matter most.

When to choose Anthropic: Claude 3 Opus

Select Claude 3 Opus for complex reasoning tasks, detailed analysis, creative writing, and applications where output quality is paramount. Perfect for research, strategic planning, nuanced content creation, and scenarios requiring careful ethical consideration or sophisticated problem-solving.

Speed & Latency

Real-world performance metrics measuring response time, throughput, and stability under load.

metric
OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo
Anthropic: Claude 3 Opus
Average latency
2500
ms
2500
ms
Tokens/Second
35
25
Response Stability
Very Good
Excellent
Verdict:
GPT-4 Turbo provides faster response times for most applications

Cost Efficiency

Price per token for input and output, affecting total cost of ownership for different use cases.

Pricing
OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo
Anthropic: Claude 3 Opus
Input ₳nyTokens
₳60
₳90
Output ₳nyTokens
₳180
₳450
Verdict:
GPT-4 Turbo wins on cost with competitive performance across tasks

Integration & API Ecosystem

Developer tooling, SDK availability, and integration capabilities for production deployments.

Feature
OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo
Anthropic: Claude 3 Opus
REST API
Official SDKs
Function Calling
Streaming Support
Multimodal Input
Open Weights
Verdict:
GPT-4 Turbo wins on cost with competitive performance across tasks

Related Comparisons

GPT-4o vs Llama 3.3 70B

GPT-4o leads in multimodal capabilities; Llama 3.3 offers open-source flexibility

Gemini 1.5 Flash vs GPT-3.5 Turbo

Gemini 1.5 Flash offers multimodal capabilities; GPT-3.5 Turbo provides reliable text processing

Grok 4 vs Grok 3

Grok 4 delivers superior performance; Grok 3 offers proven reliability

FAQs

Which model is more accurate overall?

Claude 3 Opus generally demonstrates higher accuracy in complex reasoning and nuanced tasks, while GPT-4 Turbo offers strong accuracy across a broader range of applications with faster processing.

How do the costs compare?

GPT-4 Turbo is significantly more cost-effective than Claude 3 Opus, making it better suited for high-volume applications and budget-conscious projects.

Which model is faster?

GPT-4 Turbo typically provides faster response times and higher throughput, making it more suitable for real-time applications and scenarios requiring quick turnaround.

Do both models support multimodal inputs?

Yes, both GPT-4 Turbo and Claude 3 Opus support multimodal inputs, allowing you to process both text and images in your prompts.

Can I test both models in AnyAPI Playground?

Yes! Both models are available in the AnyApi Playground where you can run side-by-side comparisons with your own prompts.

Try it for free in AnyChat

Experience these powerful AI models in real-time.
Compare outputs, test performance, and find the perfect model for your needs.