Bytedance
•
Seed-2.0-Mini
•
Released 
February 2026

Bytedance
Seed-2.0-Mini

Smallest Seed 2.0 tier: 262K-token context, image and video input, and four reasoning-effort levels for high-concurrency workloads.

Modality:
Text
Image
PDF
model ID
bytedance-seed/seed-2.0-mini

Output Speed *

N/A
tok/s

Intelligence Index *

5.5
/ 100

Context Window *

262144
tokens

Input price

0.6
Anytoken

Output price

2.4
Anytoken
Seed-2.0-Mini: Multimodal Reasoning Built for High-Concurrency Volume Seed-2.0-Mini is ByteDance Seed's smallest and most inference-efficient model in the Seed 2.0 family, below Seed 2.0 Lite and Pro. It accepts text, image and video input, supports a 262,144-token context window, and exposes four reasoning-effort levels, so teams can trade depth for latency per request. ByteDance positions it for latency-sensitive, high-concurrency, cost-sensitive work. It suits classification, extraction, moderation and multimodal triage at volume rather than fact-critical or frontier-difficulty tasks. Access Seed-2.0-Mini via the AnyAPI.ai API

Performance

Vendor-Reported Math and Coding Scores Hold Up for the Smallest Seed 2.0 Tier

In ByteDance's Seed2.0 model card, Mini scores 87.0 on AIME 2025 and 67.9 on SWE-Bench Verified, below Lite (93.0 and 73.5). These are vendor-reported figures, not independent tests. The gap suggests Mini handles structured math reasoning and routine code fixes, while harder problems belong to Lite or Pro. In production, run Mini at lower reasoning-effort levels for bulk traffic and escalate low-confidence cases to a larger model.

Technical Specifications

What the model supports

Seed-2.0-Mini takes text, image and video input and returns text only. The context window is 262,144 tokens, and the listed maximum completion is 131,072 tokens. Reasoning output counts toward total output length on at least one host (fal). That output ceiling is generous for a lightweight model, but long reasoning at higher effort levels uses it up. Knowledge cutoff is not verified. Check host-specific billing tiers above 128K input tokens before sending very large prompts.
Verified Specifications — 
Seed-2.0-Mini
*
Input modalities
Text
Image
PDF
output modalities
Text
Context window
262144
 tokens
Maximum output tokens
131072
Reasoning
Yes
Knowledge cutoff
February 2026
Pricing (standard)
0.6
 AnyTokens in
 / 
2.4
 AnyTokens out

Comparison

Seed-2.0-Mini or Seed-2.0-Lite: Where Does the Quality Gap Matter?

Both are Seed 2.0 models with a 262,144-token context window, text, image and video input, and tool calling, so the choice is mostly quality versus cost and speed. In ByteDance's model card, Lite leads on AIME 2025 (93.0 vs 87.0), Codeforces (2233 vs 1644), SWE-Bench Verified (73.5 vs 67.9) and HLE (28.2 vs 13.3). Mini has materially lower output pricing and, in a point-in-time OpenRouter measurement, a higher median throughput (131 vs 54 tokens per second).

Dimension
Seed-2.0-Mini
Seed-2.0-Lite
Context window *
262144
tokens
262144
tokens
Output speed *
N/A
tok/s
222.15
tok/s
Intelligence Index *
5.5
8.7
Input pricing
0.6
AnyToken
1.5
AnyToken
Output pricing
2.4
AnyToken
12
AnyToken
Knowledge cutoff *
February 2026
February 14, 2026

Choose Seed-2.0-Mini when volume, latency and per-request cost dominate: classification, extraction, moderation, routing and multimodal triage. Choose Seed-2.0-Lite when answer quality drives value: harder coding, deeper reasoning, or tasks where Mini's weaker factuality (FactScore 50.4 vs 62.4) creates review overhead. A practical pattern is Mini as the default tier and Lite as the escalation tier, validated on your own evaluation set.

Limitations & Trade-offs

Where Seed-2.0-Mini falls short

1
Weak factual recall. In the Seed2.0 model card, Mini scores 50.4 on FactScore, 18.9 on SimpleQA Verified and 30.0 on HealthBench, behind Seed 2.0 Lite and, on FactScore and HealthBench, far behind GPT-5 mini High (96.1 and 62.5). Closed-book question answering, medical content and knowledge-heavy writing carry higher error risk. Ground answers in supplied context or retrieval, or choose a larger model when factual accuracy is the product.
2
Lower ceiling on hard reasoning and coding. Vendor-reported results put Mini at 13.3 on HLE (Lite: 28.2), 70.0 on HMMT Feb 2025 (Lite: 90.0) and 1644 on Codeforces (Lite: 2233). Long-horizon agentic coding, competition-level math and multi-step research tasks are likelier to fail or need retries. For those workloads, Seed-2.0-Lite, Pro or the Code variant is the safer starting point.
3
Reasoning and long-context overhead. Higher effort levels generate more reasoning tokens, which adds latency and output cost within the 131,072-token completion limit. At least one host (fal) also bills inputs above 128K tokens at a higher tier, so the full 262K window is not priced like short prompts. Budget for effort level and prompt length, and keep minimal effort for routine traffic.
4
Thin independent evaluation. We found no scored Artificial Analysis entry for Seed-2.0-Mini, and BenchLM tracks it with no sourced benchmarks. Host-reported speed figures also disagree across sources. Most quality evidence is vendor-reported, and output is text only. Run your own evaluation on representative prompts before routing production traffic.

Best-Fit Workloads

Where this model earns its place

01

High-volume classification and extraction

‍
ByteDance positions Mini for latency-sensitive, high-concurrency, cost-sensitive scenarios, and it supports structured outputs and tool calling. In the model card its instruction-following scores include 91.2 on COLLIE and 61.1 on MultiChallenge, the latter above GPT-5 mini High (59.0). It fits intent tagging, field extraction and ticket routing at minimal reasoning effort. Validate outputs against a schema, since factual recall is weak.

02

Image and video triage

‍
Mini accepts image and video input and returns text, which suits content moderation, visual classification and caption-style tagging. ByteDance reports 81.2 on VideoMME for the model, below Lite and Pro. It works as a first-pass labeler where volume matters more than fine-grained visual reasoning. Send ambiguous or high-stakes items to a larger multimodal model.

03

Low-cost reasoning tier in model cascades

‍
With four effort levels and a vendor-reported 87.0 on AIME 2025, Mini can serve as the default tier, escalating to Lite or Pro only on failed validation or low confidence. This keeps most traffic on the lower-cost, faster tier. The cascade depends on a reliable confidence or validation signal, which you must build and test yourself.

04

Context-grounded long-document processing

‍
The 262,144-token window lets Mini process long reports, transcripts or multi-document bundles in one request for summarization, field extraction and question answering over supplied text. Weak closed-book factuality makes provided context essential rather than optional. Check host billing above 128K input tokens, and validate recall on your own long documents.

Pricing in anytokens via AnyAPI
Input
0.6
₳
Output
2.4
₳
Cache write
—
₳
Cache read
—
₳

Integration

Access Seed-2.0-Mini via AnyAPI.ai

Access Seed-2.0-Mini through AnyAPI.ai using a unified API built for multi-model AI applications. Integrate Seed-2.0-Mini without maintaining a separate provider-specific connection, and keep the flexibility to test, switch, or combine models as your application requirements evolve.

01

One API integration

Access Seed-2.0-Mini and other AI models through the same API workflow instead of maintaining separate integrations for every provider.

02

Easy model switching

Test Seed-2.0-Mini against alternative models or switch models as your performance, capability, or cost requirements change without rebuilding your application around another provider API.

03

Flexible for production

Use Seed-2.0-Mini from experimentation through production while keeping your AI stack flexible as workloads, traffic, and model requirements evolve.

04

Multi-model applications

Use Seed-2.0-Mini for the workloads where it performs best and combine it with other models for tasks that require different capabilities, performance, or efficiency.

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to common questions about integrating and using this AI model via AnyAPI.ai

Seed-2.0-Mini has a 262,144-token context window and a listed maximum completion of 131,072 tokens. It accepts text, image and video input and returns text only. Some hosts, such as fal, apply higher billing for inputs above 128K tokens, so check your provider's tiers before sending very long prompts.

Yes. Seed-2.0-Mini offers four reasoning-effort levels: minimal, low, medium and high. Lower levels cut reasoning tokens and latency for routine tasks, while higher levels suit harder math or logic. ByteDance reports 87.0 on AIME 2025 for the model. Availability of the effort parameter depends on the API host.

Seed-2.0-Lite scores higher, while Seed-2.0-Mini is the lower-cost, faster tier. ByteDance reports AIME 2025 of 93.0 for Lite versus 87.0 for Mini, and SWE-Bench Verified of 73.5 versus 67.9. Both share a 262,144-token context window and image and video input. Use Mini for volume and Lite for quality-sensitive work.

Seed-2.0-Mini is a capable lightweight coding model, not a leading one. ByteDance reports 67.9 on SWE-Bench Verified and a 1644 Codeforces rating, below Seed 2.0 Lite (73.5 and 2233). It suits routine fixes and code-review triage. For complex agentic coding, use Lite, Pro or the Seed 2.0 Code model.

Seed-2.0-Mini is the lowest-cost tier of the Seed 2.0 family, with much lower output pricing than Seed-2.0-Lite. Current AnyAPI.ai pricing appears in the AnyTokens component on this page. Total cost depends on input length, reasoning-effort level and output length, since reasoning tokens add to output.

* Benchmark data source: Artificial Analysis artificialanalysis.ai